Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$134.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |