Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms Xeon E5-2697 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2697 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 112 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$330
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$330 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15761 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |