Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2697 v2 outperforms Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2697 v2 is 669 days older than Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-6400 - 173 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
172
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.1
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |