Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1286 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-6400 - 106 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 3% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - CA$153.88 vs CA$158.51
- Up to 6% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-6400 - CA$1.45 vs CA$1.55 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$158.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5252 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |