Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Xeon E5-2695 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 272 days older than Xeon E5-2695 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 3% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 38 vs 37 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 - 55 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2695 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 115 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
