Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2687W outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2687W is 146 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2687W
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-8150 - 120 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2687W - 125 vs 150 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
117
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2687W | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |