Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E5-2683 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 631 days newer than Xeon E5-2683 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6900K - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2683 v3 - 180 vs 178 FPS
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18088 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2683 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |