Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3591 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2680 - 198 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 24 vs 16 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$543.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$543.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |