Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 3065 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 42% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-2680 - 64 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 20 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
64
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$425
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |