Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 13% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 574 vs 507 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 - 24 vs 20 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
574
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$619.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$619.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17429 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
115 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |