Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 365 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-13500 - 212 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13500 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - CA$482.93 vs CA$814.83
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900F - CA$2.31 vs CA$3.84 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
212
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.84/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$814.83
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$814.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
209
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$482.93
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$482.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 14 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |