Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E5-2678 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 180 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2678 v3
Server/Workstation
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
