Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2673 v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2673 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-8300 - 270 vs 235 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
235
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |