Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G5400T outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G5400T is 2218 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 - 118 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
118
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$122.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$122.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |