Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 is 363 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240 - 146 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 55 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
