Buy on Amazon
CA$83.46
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2665 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2665 is 231 days older than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2665
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than FX-8300 - 155 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 95 vs 115 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
154
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Bulk Package FX-8300
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 255 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2665
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 115 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
