Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 129 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 91 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$318.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17922 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 91 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |