Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Xeon E5-2643 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2643.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2643
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 130 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2643 - 131 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-2643
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-9920X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2643 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
