Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 477 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than EPYC 7551P - 415 vs 391 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 165 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9920X - 64 vs 24 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9920X | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | EPYC |
Skylake | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 32 |
24 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |