Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2640 v3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2640 v3 is 1763 days older than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 - 65 vs 90 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
90 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |