Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 730 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$197.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$197.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |