Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2640 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than Xeon E5-2640 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 715 vs 670 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
715
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.34
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58097 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
386
28.011611030478957%
Multi-Core
2325
48.096814232519655%
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |