Buy on Amazon
CA$479.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $359
Availability
MSRP in USD: $359
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 476 vs 372 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
476
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$479.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-13700F Desktop Processor 16 cores (8 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 30MB Cache, up to 5.2 GHz
Buy for CA$479.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-13700F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2630 v2 or Core i7-13700F
Battlefield IV, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
234 FPS
CA$5.77/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i7-13700F
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,350
In Stock
234 FPS
CA$8.38/FPS
GeForce RTX 4060
Core i7-13700F
16 GB, 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,959.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
