Buy on Amazon
CA$375
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1691 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 232 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
232
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for CA$375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2630 v2 or Ryzen 7 2700X
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
62 FPS
CA$90.55/FPS
Radeon RX 580
Ryzen 7 2700X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$5,614.11
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
