Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700 is 3068 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700
- Performs up to 8% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 193 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-12700
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-12700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
