Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4702MQ outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4702MQ is 97 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Performs up to 20% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 154 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 37 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
416
43.83561643835616%
Multi-Core
2118
72.45980157372563%
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 37 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
