Buy on Amazon
CA$520
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $306
Availability
MSRP in USD: $306
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 221 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 - 32 vs 6 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
221
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-core, 32-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor, without Cooler
Buy for CA$520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
