Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-10700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-10700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 157 days older than the cheaper Core i7-10700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-10700 - 246 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Up to 57% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$383.99 vs CA$895.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 9 3950X - CA$1.57 vs CA$3.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.64/FPS
43%
Price, CA$
CA$895
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$895 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
244
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$383.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$383.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |