Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 is 422 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i5-2400 - 209 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Xeon E5-1660
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 130 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
