Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1338 days newer than Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 13% better in War Thunder than Core i5-2400 - 153 vs 135 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 85 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |