Buy on Amazon
CA$153.88
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $406
Availability
MSRP in USD: $406
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 932 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield V than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 238 vs 231 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
238
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics - 2.9 GHz (BX80684I59400F)
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-1630 v4 or Core i5-9400F
Battlefield V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
73 FPS
CA$25.27/FPS
GeForce GTX 1660
Core i5-9400F
8 GB, 120 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,844.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
