Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 1713 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than FX-8150 - 289 vs 273 FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
273
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$93.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$93.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12682 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |