Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 293 days older than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 167 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.95/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17943 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |