Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 24% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 244 vs 196 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$400.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$400.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |