Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 862 days newer than Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 23% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-3550 - 319 vs 260 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3550 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3550
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-3550 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |