Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Core i5-3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 813 days newer than Core i5-3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Core i5-3550 - 172 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3550 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3550
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3550 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
