Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 1798 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 130 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 223 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 64 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 250 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
