Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 1946 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 264 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 15 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 15 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | No |