Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 252 vs 232 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
252
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$378.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |