Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1285L v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 2114 days newer than Xeon E3-1285L v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 207 vs 185 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
207
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$365
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$365 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13201 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |