Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1329 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than FX-8120 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1285L v4
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
