Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is 3397 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
- Performs up to 12% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E3-1280 - 180 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1280
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
