Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2200 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1270 - 183 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 12 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$302.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$302.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |