Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1612 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 11% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E3-1260L - 137 vs 123 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$69.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |