Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1245 v5 outperforms Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1245 v5 is 225 days older than Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i7-6900K - 177 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 80 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
176
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |