Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2942 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1240 - 178 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |