Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 80 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Xeon E3-1240 - 172 vs 163 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.37/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |