Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2333 days newer than Xeon E3-1240 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 69 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 18% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 175 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
175
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$988.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$988.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
69 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |