Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1220 v5 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1220 v5 is 442 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3930 - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 - 51 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |