Buy on Amazon
CA$214.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $203
Availability
MSRP in USD: $203
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 790 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 80 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 133 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Core i7 Quad-core i7-6700K 4 GHz Processor
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1220 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-6700K
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 91 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
